SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24316

PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
Pullapanthula Someswara Rao, – Appellant
Versus
Pullapanthula Lalitha Kumari, – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Plaintiffs in the suit filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Order XLIII Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. Respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. The appellants call in question order dated 24.03.2022 of learned II Additional District Judge, Guntur in I.A.No.1028 of 2018 in O.S.No.387 of 2018. By that order, the prayer for temporary injunction sought for by the plaintiffs was denied. Urging that the cause espoused before the trial Court on behalf of the plaintiffs deserve an interim injunction, the appellants have presented this civil miscellaneous appeal. Before adverting to the grounds urged here and the arguments advanced on both sides, a few facts are required to be noticed:

2. A flat in the ground floor bearing No.1B in Raga Sudha Residency which is a multistoried apartment in 2nd lane, Pandaripuram in Guntur City is the property in dispute. The plaintiffs filed O.S.No.387 of 2018 as against the defendants for a declaration that a registered sale deed dated 29.06.2016 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant Nos.4 and 5 is null and void and does not bind the plaintiffs and they also sought for a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top