Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R. Raghunandan Rao, J
Vanacherla Naga Srinu – Appellant
Versus
Alapati Ramesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputed loan details and previous suits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on rights and amendments. (Para 6 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. rationale for allowing amendment. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. arguments on trial commencement and amendment. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. outcome of the civil revision petition. (Para 15) |
ORDER:
The respondent herein had filed O.S.No.177 of 2016 before the Learned VIII Additional District Judge, Eluru for recovery of a sum of Rs.17,18,000/- from the petitioners herein, on the ground that they had taken a loan of Rs.10,00,000/- to be repaid with interest and had also executed a promissory note to that effect on 29.12.2013. The respondent took the plea that the said amount was not paid when a demand was made and that the respondent had to approach the Court for recovery of the said money.
2. The petitioners herein had filed a written statement stating that they had never executed any promissory note nor taken a loan of Rs.10,00,000/-. The petitioners also stated that they had taken a loan of Rs.1,00,000/- along with their father and had executed a simple mortgage deed in favour of the respondent as security for repayment of the said sum of Rs.1,00,000/-, which
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
