HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3330 - TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
G NARASIMHA RAO – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking to quash the charge sheet in T.E.C.No.153 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent herein. 2. The charge framed by the Tribunal against the petitioner is that, “while he was working as Prohibition and Excise Inspector (SHO), Prohibition and Excise Station, Vinukonda, from 18.12.2009 to 16.07.2012, and also worked as I/c SHO P&E Station, Ipuru, from 21.11.2011 to 23.06.2012 the petitioner herein along with other informal liquor groups, actuated by corrupt motive and in connivance with the leaders of S.U.S. and other Liquor Groups, received Mamools and abused official position by omission of lawful duties i.e. allowed belt shops, lose sales and consumption at the wine shops, sales beyond business hours, to sell the liquor over and above MRP rates and also not taken prompt action to control violations of Excise Act/Rules, besides allowing the operation of A4 wine shops in benami names of various liquor groups and running belt shops and thereby caused pecuniary advantage to the leaders of the liquor groups by not taking prompt action as mandated in accordance with law and rules and conditions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.