SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7111

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3330 - TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
G NARASIMHA RAO – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking to quash the charge sheet in T.E.C.No.153 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent herein. 2. The charge framed by the Tribunal against the petitioner is that, “while he was working as Prohibition and Excise Inspector (SHO), Prohibition and Excise Station, Vinukonda, from 18.12.2009 to 16.07.2012, and also worked as I/c SHO P&E Station, Ipuru, from 21.11.2011 to 23.06.2012 the petitioner herein along with other informal liquor groups, actuated by corrupt motive and in connivance with the leaders of S.U.S. and other Liquor Groups, received Mamools and abused official position by omission of lawful duties i.e. allowed belt shops, lose sales and consumption at the wine shops, sales beyond business hours, to sell the liquor over and above MRP rates and also not taken prompt action to control violations of Excise Act/Rules, besides allowing the operation of A4 wine shops in benami names of various liquor groups and running belt shops and thereby caused pecuniary advantage to the leaders of the liquor groups by not taking prompt action as mandated in accordance with law and rules and conditions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top