SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9600

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
THALAPALA RAJESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

It is a classic case of misuse/abuse of process of Law. Though in the normal circumstances this Court would have declined to entertain the matter and relegated the parties to raise the issues before the Trial Court, the facts and circumstances warrants no such disposal.

2. Seeking to quash the Proceedings in M.C.No.5 of 2020 pending on the file of the Court of the Learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District, the present Criminal Petition has been instituted.

3. The petitioner herein is the respondent in the said case. The 2nd respondent/petitioner invoked the provisions under Section 125 of Cr.P.C for Maintenance claiming that the petitioner married the 2nd respondent on 22.12.2019 at 9.00 a.m. to 10.30 a.m. in Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Sainagar Colony, Avilala Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and they lived together as husband and wife till 16.03.2020 and that he had started demanding the 2nd respondent to bring an amount of Rs.30,00,000/- from her mother to do business and that on 17.03.2020 early morning at 3.30 a.m. the petitioner pushed the 2nd respondent from 3rd Floor Apartment, as a result

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top