SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24220

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ****

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1004 OF 2007 Between:

State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nellore Range, Nellore …. Appellant Versus Sri Nimmakayala Vijaya @ Vijaya Kumar, S/o.Ramanaiah, Aged 30 Years, Formerly Deputy Surveyor, Dagadarthi Mandal, Nellore District. …. Respondent DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED : 09.02.2023 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No

2. Whether the copy of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether His Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? Yes/No ______________________________

A.V.RAVINDRA BABU, J * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1004 OF 2007 % 09.02.2023 # Between:

State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nellore Range, Nellore …. Appellant Versus Sri Nimmakayala Vijaya @ Vijaya Kumar, S/o.Ramanaiah, Aged 30 Years, Formerly Deputy Surveyor, Dagadarthi Mandal, Nellore District. …. Respondent ! Counsel for the Appellant : Sri S.M.Subhani, Standing Counsel and Special Public Prosecutor for SPE & ACB Cases ^ Counsel for the Respondent : Sri A. Hari Prasad Reddy < Gist:

> Head Note:

? Cases referred:

1. 2006 (1) ALT (Crl.) 114 (SC)

2. 2013 (3) ALT (Crl.) SC 316

3. 1989 Supp (2) SCC 140

4. (1970) 3 SCC 772 5. AIR 1972 SC 468

6. MANU/UP/0302/1991

7. (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1724 This Court made the following:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1004 OF 2007

JUDGMENT:

This Criminal Appeal, under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‗the Cr.P.C‘), is filed by the State, being represented by Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB), Nellore Range, Nellore through the Standing Counsel for ACB and Special Public prosecutor questioning the judgment in Calendar Case No.7 of 2003, dated 26.02.2007, on the file of the Court of Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Nellore (for short, ‗the Special Judge‘), where under the learned Special Judge found the Accused Officer (AO) not guilty of the charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) R/w. 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of the Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‗the PC Act‘)

and accordingly acquitted him under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C.

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, in C.C. No.7 of 2003 pertaining to Crime No.12/ACB-NLR/2002 of ACB Nellore Range, Nellore on the file of the Court of Special Judge is as follows:

The Accused Officer, Nimmakayala Vijaya @ Vijaya Kumar, worked as Deputy Surveyor in the Office of Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), Dagadarthi Mandal, Nellore District from 15.12.2000 to 16.09.2002 as such he is a public servant within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the PC Act. LW.1 – Gorantla Veeraiah Chowdary is a resident of Bitragunta Village, Bogolu Mandal, Nellore District. The said LW.1 has an extent of Ac.13.0‰ cents of dry land in Survey No.1-1, Ac.0.50 cents of dry land in Survey No.1-2 and Ac.3.16 cents of land in Survey No.19-1, totally an extent of Ac.16-66‰ cents and his brother G. Butchi Naidu has also an extent of Ac.16-66‰ cents in the above said survey numbers. They purchased the same from one Kakuturu Bhakthavatsala Reddy and Pundla Venkata Sivamma of Allur. They got registered the same in their favour. They obtained pattadar pass books from MRO, Dagadarthi. LW.1 – G. Veeraiah Chowdary sold an extent of Ac.5.30 cents of land in Survey No.1/1 to his brother Butchaiah Naidu. So, he, with an intention to get survey his land, submitted a representation to MRO, Dagadarthi (LW.7) on 01.09.2001 with a request to survey the land of him and his brother and to fix the boundaries. LW.7 – MRO, Dagadarthi endorsed the representation of the de-facto complainant to the AO, who is Deputy Surveyor, with instructions to attend the work.

LW.4 - Smt. Kamineni Annapurnamma and Nethi Lakshmi have also lands in the above said survey numbers. K. Annapurnamma also approached the then MRO, Dagadarthi and submitted a representation with a request to show the boundaries of her land. MRO instructed the then Surveyor. But, the then Surveyor did not show the boundaries and he was transferred. About 9 months prior to 15.09.2002, the AO visited the land of LW.1 at Kaminenipalem and surveyed the same but failed to give his report. LW.1, de-facto complainant approached the AO several times and asked him about the survey report. But, he did not give his report. About one week prior to 15.09.2002, LW.1 approached the AO and enquired about the survey report. Then the AO, being a public servant, demanded him to pay illegal gratification of Rs.15,000/- to do official favour. Again, on 14.09.2002 at 07:00 a.m. LW.1 approached the AO at his residence at Beeramgunta and enquired about the survey report. The AO reiterated his earlier demand. Then, LW.1 expressed his inability to pay such huge amount. Then, AO reduced the bribe as that of Rs.8,000/- and demanded him to pay the same on 16.09.2002 at 10:00 a.m. As he has no other go, he accepted to pay the same and went away. LW.1, who was not willing to pay the illegal gratification to AO, approached LW.12 – Inspector of Police, ACB, Nellore on

15.09.2002 and gave a report. LW.11, the in-charge Deputy Superintendent of Police, ACB, Nellore registered it as a case in Crime No.12/ACB-NLR/2002.

4. Pre trap proceedings took place in the office room

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top