SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20443

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
K MADDILETI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER

The writ petition is filed complaining the high handed action on the part of respondents in interfering with the petitioner‟s possession and enjoyment in respect of Ac.1.25 cents in R.S.No.34/10 of Kurnool without following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. In the affidavit, it was contended that petitioner‟s father has been in possession and enjoyment of an extent of Ac.1.25 cents since long time till his death in the year 2009. Later, the petitioner came into possession and has been cultivating the land by raising rain fed crops. The respondents 2 and 5 without issuing any notice are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land and hence, the writ petition is filed.

3. Heard Sri Ch.B.R.P.Sekhar, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned Standing Counsel for 2nd respondent and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 3 to 5.

4. The adangal report dated 22.09.2023 filed along with writ petition would disclose that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of Ac.1.25 cents in S.No.34/10 and the possession of petitioner is shown as „encroacher‟.

5. Learned standing counsel for 2nd respondent, on instruct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top