SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17096

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO, J
G THIMMA RAJU CHITTOOR DIST – Appellant
Versus
K MANOHAR RAJU @ MANOHAR CHITTOOR DIST – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

The Revision Petition in C.R.P.No. 3155 of 2016, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the order dated 20.06.2016, in I.A.No. 365 of 2016 in O.S.No.17 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor District (in short ‘the court below’) which was filed under order VII, rule 14(3) and Section 151 of C.P.C seeking to condone the delay in filing the documents to prove the case of the plaintiff. The Revision Petition in C.R.P.No. 3168 of 2016, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the order dated 20.06.2016, in I.A.No. 364 of 2016 in O.S.No.17 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor District (in short ‘the court below’) which was filed under order 18, rule 17 and Section 151 of C.P.C seeking to recall the PW-1 for the purpose of marking the documents on the side of the plaintiff.

The Revision Petition in C.R.P.No. 3201 of 2016, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the order dated 20.06.2016, in I.A.No. 363 of 2016 in O.S.No.17 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor District (in short ‘ the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top