HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3365 - Dr V R K KRUPA SAGAR
Pullapanthula Someswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Pullapanthula Lalitha Kumari – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
Plaintiffs in the suit filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Order XLIII Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. Respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. The appellants call in question order dated 24.03.2022 of learned II Additional District Judge, Guntur in I.A.No.1028 of 2018 in O.S.No.387 of 2018. By that order, the prayer for temporary injunction sought for by the plaintiffs was denied. Urging that the cause espoused before the trial Court on behalf of the plaintiffs deserve an interim injunction, the appellants have presented this civil miscellaneous appeal. Before adverting to the grounds urged here and the arguments advanced on both sides, a few facts are required to be noticed:
2. A flat in the ground floor bearing No.1B in Raga Sudha Residency which is a multistoried apartment in 2nd lane, Pandaripuram in Guntur City is the property in dispute. The plaintiffs filed O.S.No.387 of 2018 as against the defendants for a declaration that a registered sale deed dated 29.06.2016 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant Nos.4 and 5 is null and void and does not bind the plaintiffs and they also sought for a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.