SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 770

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
BODE NARASIMHA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SMT.DEVARAPATLA RANI – Respondent


ORDER:

Defendants in suit filed the above revision under Article

227 of the Constitution of India seeking expeditious disposal of I.A.No.340 of 2021 in O.S.No.118 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Piler.

2. Respondent, being the plaintiff filed O.S.No.118 of 2021 (O.S.No.37 of 2021 before Vacation Judge, Chittoor), seeking perpetual injunction against the defendants. Plaintiff also filed I.A.No.340 of 2021 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of CPC for grant of ad-interim injunction.

3. Trial Court by order dated 03.06.2021 granted ad-interim injunction and adjourned the matter to 02.07.2021. Trial Court also directed the plaintiff to comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3 of CPC. The grievance of the petitioners/defendants is that notwithstanding filing of the counter, the trial Court did not dispose of I.A.No.340 of 2021 as contemplated under Order XXXIX Rule 3(A) of CPC.

4. In the affidavit filed in support of the revision petition, it was averred that the interlocutory application is being adjourned from time to time without disposing of the same. Learned counsel for the petitioners asserted that the said interlocutory application stands posted to 22.07.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top