SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 81

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J
ADAPALLI BHAGYA LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Order:

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the docket order, dated 27.05.2022, passed in C.C.No.1131 of 2019 by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for trial of Prohibition and Excise Offences, Nellore.

2. A private complaint has been filed as against the second respondent herein in CC No.1131 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for trial of Prohibition and Excise Offences, Nellore, for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned Magistrate, dismissed the said complaint, by way of a docket order, dated 27.05.2022, which reads thus.

“Complainant called absent. No representation.

Advocate for complainant not present. Accused absent and this matter is coming for examination of accused under Section 251 of Cr.P.C., but neither parties nor their counsels appearing before this Court and represent the case since long and since transfer of this case to the file of this Court, hence it is deemed the complainant has no interest to proceed with the case. Hence this complaint is dismissed for default.”

3. Against the said order, the present Criminal Revision Case cam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top