SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3501

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3299 - RAVI NATH TILHARI
KADAR VALLI SHAIK – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri P. Sree Ramulu Naidu, Sri Ch. Madhava Rao on behalf of Sri K.

V. Aditya Chowday and Sri Surepalli Madhava Rao, learned counsels for the petitioners, Sri G. Arun Showri and Ms. Alekhya Tadasina, learned Central Government Counsel and learned GP for Home for the respondents.

2. As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is common, on the request of the learned counsels for the parties, all these three writ petitions were heard together and are being decided by the common judgment, at this stage.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

3. W.P.No.1392 of 2023 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner for the following relief:

―to issue a Writ Direction Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to renew not renewing the Petitioner‘s Passport No.L0037632 on the ground that FIR in Crime No.223/2018 u/s 498 A of IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act dated 02.06.2018 was registered on the file of S.H.O, T- Sundupal1i Police Station in CC No.03/2019 on the file of Honourable Principal Junior Civi1 Judge-cum-J.F.C.M, Rayachoty, YSR District, Andhra Pradesh against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top