2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 19207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION No.27582 OF 2023 Between :
Sri Arts and Crafts Society, H.No.4-8-378A, Srigiri Colony, Srisailam, Nandyal District, represented by its Proprietor T.Md.Rafi, S/o. Mahabublal.
… Petitioner Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented through Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and Two (2) others.
… Respondents DATE OF ORDER PRONOUNCED : 19.10.2023 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the order? : Yes/No
2. Whether the copy of order may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : Yes/No
3. Whether His Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the order? : Yes/No __________________________
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J * HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI + WRIT PETITION NO.27582 OF 2023 % 19.10.2023 WRIT PETITION NO.27582 OF 2023 :
Between :
Sri Arts and Crafts Society, H.No.4-8-378A, Srigiri Colony, Srisailam, Nandyal District, represented by its Proprietor T.Md.Rafi, S/o. Mahabublal.
… Petitioner Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented through Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and Two (2) others.
… Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioner : Sri M.Vidyasagar ^ Counsel for Respondents : GP for Endowments for R-1 and R-3 and Sri G.Ramana Rao, Standing Counsel for R-2 < Gist:
> Head Note:
? Cases referred:
1) (1994) 1 ALT 227
2) (1992) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1
3) (2001) 1 ALD 443 4) 2012 (6) ALD 458 This Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.27582 OF 2023 Sri Arts and Crafts Society, H.No.4-8-378A, Srigiri Colony, Srisailam, Nandyal District, represented by its Proprietor T.Md.Rafi, S/o. Mahabublal.
… Petitioner Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented through Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and Two (2) others.
… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M.Vidyasagar Counsel for respondents : GP for Endowments for R-1 and R-3 and Sri G.Ramana Rao, Standing Counsel for R-2
ORDER
The above writ petition is filed to declare the e-Tender Notification in FILE/NIT No.G2/3772/2023, dated 12.10.2023 issued by the Executive Officer of 2nd respondent for procurement of pure cotton Khanduvas and Dhoties for the period from 01.11.2023 to 31.10.2024, incorporating condition No.2 prohibiting non-Hindu religious persons from participating in e-Tender, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard Sri Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and Sri G.Ramana Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
3. Government issued G.O.Ms.No.426 Revenue (Endowments-I) Department, dated 09.11.2015 making amendments to Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Immovable Properties and Other Right (Other than Agricultural Lands) Leases and Licenses Rules, 2003. Rule No.4 of the original Rules was substituted.
Rule 4(2)(K) of the substituted Rules reads as under:
“(K) No person professing other than Hinduism as his religion is entitled to obtain lease or license either through tender – cum-public auction or otherwise.”
4. Challenging Rule 4(2)(K) and Rule 18, W.P.No.40252 of 2015 and Batch were filed. The Division Bench of this Court by common order dated 01.11.2019 dismissed those writ petitions.
The operative portion of the order reads as follows:
“Considering the principles laid down in the above judgments including the judgments of Apex Court in M.P.Gopalakrishnan Nair v. State of Kerala (AIR 2005 SC 3053) where non-Hindus are debarred for being elected as member of Trust Board and the Madras High Court judgment in Force 1 Guarding Services Pvt.Ltd. v. The State of Tamilnadu (W.P.No.20024 of 2011), wherein non-Hindus debarred from participating in tender process for providing security guards to the temple.
Similarly, Act 30 of 1987 itself provides certain provisions debarring non-Hindus for being appointed as members of Trust Board, employees or Commissioner etc., under Sections 19 and 20 of the Act. When Sections 153 of the Act 30 of 1987 permits the Government to frame rules and regulations with regard to any matters covered by the Act, the rules framed by the Government, which are impugned in the writ petition debarring non-Hindus from participating in auction is not violative of Articles 14, 15, 26 and 26 of the Constitution of India.
Based on the principles laid down by the Apex Court in M.P.Gopalakrishnanan Nair v. State of Kerala (referred above) and the Madras High Court judgment in “Force 1 Guarding Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Tamilnadu (W.P.No.20024 of 2011), Muraleedharan Nair v. State of Kerala (1990 (1) KLT 874) and Narayanan Namboodiri v. State of Kerala (AIR 2005 SC 3053), we hold that the amended rules are not violative of any fundamental right guaranteed under the Constitution of India or any statutory right and the amended rules are valid. Consequently, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.”
5. Aggrieved by the order, writ petitioner in W.P.No.40252 of 2015 filed SLP (C) 1989 of 2020. The Hon’ble Apex Court on
27.01.2020 passed the following order:
“Issue notice, returnable in six weeks. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 27 September 2019 in W.P.No.40252 of 2015, shall remain stayed.”
6. Be it as it may, the Executive Officer of the 2nd respondent issued e-Tender for procurement of pure cotton Kanduvas and Dhothies. As per the Tender schedule, downloading of bid documents starts from 12.10.2023 at 10.00 AM and ends by 19.10.2023 at 1.00 PM. Last date and time for receipt is 19.10.2023 at 3.00 PM. Opening date and time of technical bid is on 19.10.2023 at 4.00 PM and price bid opening is on 19.10.2023 at 4.30 PM. Second condition in the Tender is that non-Hindu religion persons are not permitted to participate in the Tender.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that in view of the interim ord