SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20734

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
C.Linga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…. to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction declaring the action of Respondents in keeping the property belonging to the petitioner i.e. land adrneasuring Ac.10.83 Paiki Ac.3.81 cents in Sy.No.176 of Rachanapalli Village Fields, Ananthapuram Mandal and District in the category of “Digitally Not Signed” i.e. “Red Mark” as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction violative of Article 300A of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith delete the above property from the category of “Digitally Not Signed” and see that the same is kept in the “Digitally Signed List” forthwith and also not to evict the petitioner from the above land and pass….”

2. The short grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that, without following the procedure contemplated under rule 9(1)(c)(iii) of the Andhra Pradesh Right in Land and Pattadar passbooks Rules, 1989, the Tahsildar has put the petitioner’s property admeasuring Ac.10.83 Paiki Ac.3.81 cents in Sy.No.176 of Rachanapalli Village Fields, Ananthapura

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top