SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2028

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Chilukuri Krishna Babu, – Appellant
Versus
Kamana Neeraja, – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

1. The Appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.'), is filed by the Appellants/Defendants challenging the decree and Judgment dated 20.01.2010 in O.S.No.204 of 2007 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Guntur (for short, 'the trial court').

2. Respondent is the Plaintiff who filed the suit in O.S. No.204 of 2007 seeking primary relief of Specific Performance of pre-emption condition incorporated in the registered sale deed, dated 15.06.2006 with a request to direct the Defendants to execute a regular registered sale deed regarding suit ‘B’ schedule property, after receiving the consideration amount and also granting relief of Permanent Injunction, restraining them from interfering with the Plaintiffs’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of ‘A’ schedule property.

3. Referring to the parties hereinafter as arrayed in the suit is expedient to mitigate potential confusion and better comprehend the case. 4. The factual matrix, necessary and germane for adjudicating the contentious issues between the parties inter se, may be delineated as follows:

(a) The 1st Plaintiff's husband is the managing partner of the 2nd Plaintiff's f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top