SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16997

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
ATLURI RAM KIRAN – Appellant
Versus
KODALI VENKATA SUBBA RAO – Respondent


Advocates:
SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU, G VIJAYA BABU

COMMON ORDER:

These two revisions are directed against the orders, dated 20.06.2023, dismissing I.A.No.51 of 2023 and 52 of 2023 in O.S.No.72 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-XI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Gannavaram.

2. Heard Sri K. Sivarama Krishna, the learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant and Sri G.Vijaya Babu, the learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.

3. C.R.P.No.1545 of 2023 is filed aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.51 of 2023, whereas C.R.P.No.1546 of 2023 is filed aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.52 of 2023. Since both the applications arise out of the same suit, both the revisions are heard together and are being disposed of together.

4. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant for convenience and clarity.

5. The facts, in brief, are as follows:

a. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit against the petitioner/ defendant for recovery of amount on the basis of a promissory note. There were disputes between the defendant and the son of the plaintiff, by name, Sri Teja, with regard to the business transactions. Both of them jointly did hotel business in Gannavaram and when the defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top