SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16913

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J
Gaddam Venkata Ramana – Appellant
Versus
Emani Lakshmana Murthy – Respondent


Advocates:
T S N MURTHY, V S R S NAIDU

Judgment:

This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is filed aggrieved against the decree and judgment, dated 24.11.2010 in A.S.No.172 of 2007 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada, allowed in part by its judgment and decree, dated 09.08.2007 in O.S.No.154 of 2000, on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada (for short „trial Court‟).

2. The appellant herein is the 1st defendant before the trial Court, respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein are the plaintiffs before the trial Court and 4th respondent herein is the 3rd defendant before the trial Court.

3. The plaintiffs initiated action in O.S.No.154 of 2000, on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, with a prayer to declare their title to the plaint schedule property and for recovery of possession of the same after ejecting the defendants and their men therefrom and to grant past and future profits and for costs of the suit.

4. The learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, dismissed the suit without costs. Felt aggrieved of the same, the unsuccessful plaintiffs in the above said suit filed A.S.No.172 of 2007, on the file of the IV Additional D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top