Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr V R K Krupa Sagar, J
Kurapatgi Vimala Kumari – Appellant
Versus
D.Chandrasekhara Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over partition of property. (Para 1) |
| 2. responses to the partition claim. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. evidence of property ownership. (Para 12) |
| 4. analysis of joint family vs self-acquired property. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final findings and conclusions. (Para 21 , 24) |
1. This appeal by 7th defendant impugns the judgement dated 07.08.2003 of learned II Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru in A.S.No.132 of 1999. 1st respondent was the sole plaintiff in O.S.No.287 of 1995. Respondent Nos.2 to 7 were defendant Nos. 1 to 6. The controversy among parties is about partition of an immovable property consisting of 223.8 square yards of site and a tiled house with front daba varandha situated in southern street of Eluru which is fully described in the schedule of the plaint filed in O.S.No.287 of 1995. 2. Sri D.Venkata Subba Rao and Smt. Nagaratnamma are wife and husband to each other. During their wedded life, they begot six sons and two daughters. One of his sons is Sri D. Chandrashekhar Rao. He filed O.S.No.287 of 1995 showing his father as 1st defendant and his brothers as defendant Nos. 2 to 6 and purchaser of the property as 7th defendan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
