ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and

401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) impugns the order dated 01.08.2018 of the learned VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Gajuwaka in DDR No.4299 of 2018. By the said order the complaint filed by the revision petitioner was dismissed. 2. Various grounds are alleged in the revision and the revision petitioner- Sri Sugan Chandra Gupta having been permitted as per the rules appeared and argued in person. For respondents, Sri Ch.B.R.P.Sekhar, the learned counsel appeared and submitted arguments. There is on record counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents and a reply counter affidavit filed by the revision petitioner.

3. According to the revision petitioner, these respondents committed offences under Sections 166,167, 192, 120A, 107 and 119 read with 34 and Section 44 I.P.C and the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate ought to have summoned them and prosecuted them and its failure resulted in injustice. In such circumstances, it is relevant to find out what is stated in the complaint and for that purpose the complaint is extracted as below:

“IN THE HONOURABLE COURT OF VIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METRO