HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3330 - TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
M.ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
V.D NAIDU – Respondent
ORDER:
Assailing the order dated 10.12.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.2436 of
2018 in STC.No.35 of 2016, the present Criminal Petition is filed. Whereas, the petitioner/accused has filed an application under Section 45C of Evidence Act, the said application was dismissed by the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati for not producing 65B certificate and rejected the application filed by the petitioner/accused relying on the judgment of Anvar P.V. Vs. P.K.Basheer1, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court held that secondary evidence of electronic record sought to be given cannot be admitted in the absence of certificate as specified in
65-B(4) of Evidence Act.
Proof of electronic record is a special provisions introduced by the Information Technology Act, amending various provisions under the Evidence Act. Section 65 read with Section 59 and 65A as special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record, shall be governed by the procedure prescribed under Section 65B of the Evidence Act to prove the contents of
electronic records. Section 59 is regarding proof of facts by oral evidence, which read as under:
"59. Proof of facts by oral evidence.-- All facts, except the [con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.