SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8937

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
GADDAM NARASIMHULU – Appellant
Versus
BASIREDDY RAJESWARA REDDY – Respondent


ORDER:

This civil revision petition is filed to set aside the return endorsement dated 21.11.2023 in I.A.No……..of 2023 in CMA.No.4 of 2021 on the file the Court of the Additional District Judge, Kadapa, at Proddatur.

2. The petitioner herein is the appellant in CMA.No.4 of 2021. Sri Janapati Rama Gopal of Proddatur, as an advocate, filed the said appeal. Later Sri P.Balaji an advocate filed a memo vide IA(SR).No.7041 of 20.11.2023, which reads as follows:-

“It is humbly submitted to the Hon‟ble Court that ONE Janapati rama Gopal of Proddatur obtained the signatures of appellant in some papers and got filed the above C.M.A.No.4/2021 on the file of this Hon‟ble Court with false allegations mentioning my client as appellant without his knowledge. After it came to his notice, he enquired about the advocate who filed the vakalat on his behalf and approached me to file vakalat on his behalf for the purpose of not-pressing the above C.M.A.

Hence I sent my clerk to the earlier counsel who filed the vakalat on behalf of the appellant for the purpose of taking no objection on the vakalat. But the earlier counsel reluctant to give no objection in the vakalat on behalf of appellant. Hence I am fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top