SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8612

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
Chintha Aneel Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER

The above writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the Net Cricket Sports Hub being run under the name and style of CRICZ HUB in an extent of 1658.32 Sq.yards situated in Plot Nos.45 to 48 in R.S.No.401/1A 2 in L.P.No.140/88 of Pidingoyye, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District and trying to demolish the same with the help of respondents 4 and 5, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Notice vide U.C.No.11/2023/RJY/TPS/CIRCLE No.4, Secretariat No.20, dated 13.12.2023 was issued under Sections 452 (1) and 461(1) of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short “MC Act”) and Sections 86, 89 (1 & 2), and 90(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Metropolitan Region and Urban Development Authorities Act, 2016 (for short “the Act, 2016”) to the petitioner. Since no explanation was submitted by the petitioner, confirmation order vide Notice No.11/2023/TPS2/CIRCLE No.04/SECRETARIAT No.20, dated 21.12.2023 was issued under Sections 452 (1) and 461(1) of MC Act and Sections 86 and 89 (3) of the Act, 2016. Assailing the said action of the respondent authorities, the petitioner filed the above writ petition.

3. Heard S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top