SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17684

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ravi Nath Tilhari, Challa Gunaranjan, JJ
BODAPATI THATARAO – Appellant
Versus
BODAPATI RAMASUBBAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Soora Venkata Sainath

Table of Content
1. accident details and claimants (Para 2 , 3)
2. tribunal's findings on negligence (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
3. maintainability of mvop (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
4. appeal dismissed (Para 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Soora Venkata Sainath, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material on record.

3. The Tribunal allowed the MVOP with cots, awarding compensation of Rs.32,09,000/- with future interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of deposit of the amount.

5. The claimant/1 st respondent is the widow and claimant/3 rd respondent is the son of the deceased. The other two claimants/respondents No.2 & 4 are the daughters of the deceased. The claim was filed against the 5 th respondent herein the owner-cum-driver of the offending vehicle, and its insurer, the National Insurance Company Limited, the present 6 th respondent. The appellant herein was the 3 rd respondent in the MVOP. The appellant is also the son of the deceased late Bodapati Satyanarayana and thus, related to the claimants. It appears that he did not join the claimants-respondents and conseq

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top