ORDER

This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order, dated 27.07.2022, dismissing the petition in I.A.No.1714 of 2019 in O.S.No.46 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Ananthapuramu, filed by the revision petitioner/2^nd defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC to reject the plaint.

2. Heard Sri Seelam Krishna Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner. In spite of service of notice, there is no representation for the respondents No.1 to 5.

3. The respondents No.1 to 5 filed the suit for partition. The petitioner/2^nd defendant contended that she purchased the land from the father of the plaintiffs in the year 1994 and since then she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. She further submitted that the plaintiffs pleaded that the suit schedule property was purchased by their grandfather, by name, Marineni Venkatappa, under various sale deeds, and therefore, the father of the plaintiffs succeeded the property as his separate property and the same is not ancestral property in his hands as held by the Supreme Court, and therefore, it is not liable for partition. The suit was resisted on the ground of bar of