SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21183

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3460 - B SYAMSUNDER
CHINTAGUNTA ALIAS CHINTAGUNTLA PEDDA RAMAKKA – Appellant
Versus
CHINTAGUNTLA VENKATAIAH – Respondent


ORDER:

The present civil revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 20.10.2014 in E.A.No.35 of 2012 in E.P.No.100 of 2010 in O.S.No.268 of 2008 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Giddalur.

2. The petitioners are the claimants. Respondent No.1 is the decree holder, respondent No.2 is judgment debtor and respondent No.3 is the auction purchaser. The schedule property was sold for realization of the decretal amount on 10.10.2011.

The same was confirmed on 14.12.2011.

3. Thereafter, the petitioners filed the present application E.A.No.35 of 2012 to set aside the sale on the ground that they are having right and title over the schedule property as they had purchased the same under a registered sale deed No.436/1968 dated 13.03.1968, S.R.O, Cumbum, Prakasam District. It is the case of the petitioners that prior to the auction of the schedule properties, no document showing ownership of the judgment debtor was filed and the trial Court without examining this aspect conducted the auction on the premise that the property belongs to respondent No.2. The trial Court after enquiry dismissed the application vide order dated 20.10.2014. Questioning the same, the present civil r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top