SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17744

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO, J
PAPASANI GOVINDU REDDY – Appellant
Versus
PASANI RAMA THIMMA REDDY – Respondent


Advocates:
AYESHA AZMA S, GANTA EDIGA RAKESH GOUD

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the docket order dated 20.09.2024 passed in E P No.841 of 2024 in O.S No.279 of 2022 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dhone, Kurnool.

2. Brief facts of the case are that, originally, the suit in O.S No.279 of 2022 has been filed by the plaintiff/ 1st respondent herein against the defendants/petitioner and respondents No.2 and 3 herein before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dhone (for short “the trial Court”) seeking for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents and friends etc.., from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule lands. Summons were served on the defendants. Service was held sufficient and defendants No.1 and 3 were called absent and defendants No.2 did not choose to file written statement before the trial Court within statutory period and as such the defendants were made set ex parte. The said suitwas decreed as prayed for with costs vide judgment dated 26.7.2023. Later, on 23.01.2023 the J.Dr No.1 and 3 i.e., petitioner/J.Dr.No.1 and respondent No.3/J.Dr.No.3, without any right, have entered into plaint schedule and used to go in middle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top