SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2172

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
POOJARI SOMASUNDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

The respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein who are aggrieved persons filed the petition under Section 12 of The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short “the Act”), to provide protection orders under Section 18 of the Act; Residence Orders under Section 19 of the Act; Monetary Relief under Section 20 of the Act and Custody Orders under Section 21 of the Act in DVC No.2 of 2018 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, against the petitioner who is respondent in D.V.C. case.

2. It is alleged in the petition filed under Section 12 of the Act that the aggrieved person led the conjugal life/matrimonial life with the petitioner/respondents smoothly for a period of 2 years, thereafter, the petitioner/respondent started demanding additional dowry and he has taken forcibly the ATM card of the aggrieved person and harassed without providing any minimum needs and used to pick up quarrels on one or other aspect and used to manhandle and threatening to the life of the aggrieved person. Despite filing of FCOP on the file of the Family Court, Nellore for restitution of conjugal life, though it was decreed, the petitioner/respondent has not complied the or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top