SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8122

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO
A.THIMMA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

The Appellants herein are the applicants before The Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati Bench, Amaravati (in short ‘the learned tribunal’) filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before this Court, aggrieved by the order dated 18.03.2019 passed by the learned Tribunal in O.A-II(U).No.11 of 2012.

2. The appellants herein are the legal representative of deceased A. Satish Kumar, has made a claim before the learned tribunal seeking compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/- along with interest from the respondent/ Railways on account of death of deceased in an untoward incident that occurred on 10.06.2011 while travelling, as there was heavy rush of passengers, suddenly, the deceased slipped and fallen down accidently from the running train at Pedakakani Railway Station in between Guntur and Mangalagiri Railway Station, received severe injuries and died on 21.06.2011. The learned tribunal after hearing on both sides, holding that the deceased is not proved to be a bonafide passenger and he was also not a victim of accidental falling from the train, which is highly doubtful and that the appellants have failed to prove their case and dismissed the claim application. Assailing the same,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top