SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
Smt.Karibandi Surya Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Pothireddy Veera Raghavamma – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard Mr.Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. Notice on the other respondents is deemed not necessary as the grievance of the petitioner is non-registration of suit filed vide O.S (SR) No.1558 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the IX Additional District Judge, Kovvur, West Godavari District.

2. The petitioner being the plaintiff presented a plaint on 15.07.2021 seeking a Decree in his favour and against the defendants 1 and 2 mentioned therein for partition of land acquisition compensation amount in respect of the plaint schedule property into two equal shares between the petitioner and the 1st respondent/1st defendant and for allotment of one such share to the petitioner/plaintiff by retaining the remaining half share to the 1st plaintiff/1st defendant by declaring that the petitioner/plaintiff and the 1st respondent/1st defendant alone are entitled to the compensation amount and other benefits equally as they are the only successors of one late Mareddy Jagga Rao and late Subhadramma and late Butchiraju and his wife late Hemala Satyavathi and for other reliefs. The said plaint was returned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top