SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.GOUTHAM REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to quash theproceedings in M.C. No.4/2019 on the file of 2nd respondent- Additional District Magistrate and Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Metropolitan Area, Vijayawada, dated 08.03.2019, under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), whereby, 2nd respondent directed the petitioners and unofficial respondents herein to show cause as to why they should not be ordered to execute bonds with sureties for the like sum of Rs.20,000/- each, in order to keep peace for a period of one year.

2. Heard Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing 1st respondent-State. Though notice was served on unofficial respondents, they did not choose to make appearance.

3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that the impugned proceedings in M.C.No.4/2019 initiated by 2nd respondent-Additional District Magistrate, by passing order dated 08.03.2019, is totally on non-application of mind, and there is no material brought before 2nd respondent as to the alleged breach of the peace or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top