P.GOUTHAM REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to quash theproceedings in M.C. No.4/2019 on the file of 2nd respondent- Additional District Magistrate and Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Metropolitan Area, Vijayawada, dated 08.03.2019, under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), whereby, 2nd respondent directed the petitioners and unofficial respondents herein to show cause as to why they should not be ordered to execute bonds with sureties for the like sum of Rs.20,000/- each, in order to keep peace for a period of one year.
2. Heard Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing 1st respondent-State. Though notice was served on unofficial respondents, they did not choose to make appearance.
3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that the impugned proceedings in M.C.No.4/2019 initiated by 2nd respondent-Additional District Magistrate, by passing order dated 08.03.2019, is totally on non-application of mind, and there is no material brought before 2nd respondent as to the alleged breach of the peace or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.