SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ****

W.P. No.28907 of 2014 Between:

P.V.Lav Kumar Reddy S/o Venkatachalapathi Reddy, aged about 31 years Occupation : Cultivation R/o Gunjarlapalle Village Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District …. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, and seven others …. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 13.06.2022 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes / No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters / Journals? Yes / No

3. Whether His Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes / No _________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J * THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO + W.P. No.28907 of 2014 % 13.06.2022 Between:

P.V.Lav Kumar Reddy S/o Venkatachalapathi Reddy, aged about 31 years Occupation : Cultivation R/o Gunjarlapalle Village Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District …. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, and seven others …. Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioner : Sri D.Krishna Murthy ^ Counsel for Respondents : Sri K.Raghuveer, Government Pleader for Higher Education for respondents 1, 2 and 6 to 8 < Gist:

> Head Note:

? Cases referred:

1) 2016 (5) ALT 5

2) MANU/AP/0742/2021

3) AIR 1953 Mad 279 = MANU/TN/0155/1953

4) 19 Mad 154

5) MANU/SC/0063/2009 = (2009) 3 SCC 571 6) MANU/AP/0048/1969 = AIR 1969 AP 136

7) MANU/TN/0202/1984 = AIR 1984 Mad 292

8) 17 Ind Cas 22

9) (1998) III MLJ 537 = MANU/TN/1215/1998

10) MANU/WB/0347/1928 = AIR 1929 Cal 542 11) MANU/UP/0064/1970 = AIR 1970 All 404 12) (2015) 6 ABR 29 = MANU/MH/0499/2015

13) MANU/KA/0136/1982 = AIR 1982 Kant 314

14) MANU/KE/0129/2006 = 2006 (2) KLT 636 15) MANU/BH/0032/1988 = AIR 1988 Pat 216 16) 2002 (1) SCC 134 = MANU/SC/0667/2001 17) AIR 1967 SC 993 = MANU/SC/0275/1966 18) (2004) 4 SCC 460 = MANU/SC/0307/2004 19) 2015 (15) SCC 1 = MANU/SC/1041/2015

20) MANU/AP/0742/2021 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Writ Petition No.28907 of 2014

ORDER:

The petitioner prays for a mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 6 to 8 in implementing the orders of the respondents 2 & 3 in Rc.No.5545/B3/2013 dated 31.07.2014 and Roc.E5/9839/2012 dated 22.07.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents 6 to 8 to implement the aforesaid orders.

2. The petitioner‘s case succinctly is thus:

(a) The petitioner is the resident of Gunjarlapalle Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District. He owns land of Ac.1.18 cents in Sy.No.120/2 of 28, Gundisettipalle Village of Santhipuram Mandal. There is a Cart Track existing in Sy.No.120/4 and 120/6 from times immemorial to reach the agricultural lands of the petitioner and others. The said Cart Track is recorded in the Village Map also.

(b) While so, the Government have alienated the land in Sy.No.120/4 and

120/6 in favour of the Zilla Parishad / respondent No.8 for construction of High School and Junior College. The 8th respondent accordingly constructed High School and Junior College in Sy.No.120/4 and 120/6 encroaching upon the existing age old Cart Track. Due to such encroachment now there is no other way to approach the lands of the petitioner and others.

(c) The petitioner submitted an application to 5th respondent on 11.04.2011 requesting to conduct survey of the land in Sy.No.120/4 and 120/6 and demarcate the boundaries to the existing Cart Track, High School and Junior College. In turn, the 5th respondent directed the Mandal Surveyor to conduct survey and submit report regarding the status of the Cart Track. The Mandal Surveyor accordingly conducted survey and submitted report to 5th respondent stating that there was a Cart Track existing in an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No.120/4 and that a school building was constructed encroaching upon the Cart Track. Thereafter the 5th respondent inspected land and submitted report to the District Collector, Chittoor / 3rd respondent vide proceedings in Roc.A/93/2011 dated 27.04.2011 stating that the school building and Junior College were constructed encroaching upon existing Cart Track. He further stated that the Cart Track can be restored by providing 12 feet width approach road in the land in between the High School building and Junior College building for which the permission of the District Educational Officer, Chittoor / 2nd respondent is required. Thereafter, the 3rd respondent in his letter in L.Dis.E5/4190/11 dated 09.05.2011 instructed 5th respondent to address letter to 2nd respondent seeking permission to provide Cart Track through the land in Sy.No.120/4. Accordingly, the Tahsildar addressed letter to the D.E.O. vide Roc.B/93/2011 dated 09.07.2012 for necessary permission. The 2nd respondent has granted permission to provide Cart Track and addressed letter to the Mandal Educational Officer, Santhipuram Mandal / 7th respondent informing about the grant of permission for providing Cart Track to a width of 12 feet through the land in between the High School building and Junior College building. However, the 7th respondent has not taken any action for providing the Cart Track as per the permission accorded by the 2nd respondent.

(d) That apart, the Sub-Collector / 4th respondent also inspected the site and submitted report to the 3rd respondent vide his office Roc.B1/9516/2012 dated 31.05.2013 requesting the District Collector, Chittoor to direct 2nd respondent and the 5th respondent to take steps to restore the Cart Track. The 3rd respondent vide his office letter Roc.E5/9839/2012 dated 01.07.2013 directed the 2nd respondent to inspect the land and take necessary steps to restore the Cart Track. He also issued a reminder to 2nd respondent to take action in the matter. Pursuant thereto, the 2nd respondent addressed letter to the Head Master, Government High School and 6th respondent to take action in the matter immediately and report. However, no action has been taken so far. The inaction on the part of the respondents 6 to 8 is arbitrary an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top