SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Pudicheri Lalithamma @ Padmamma, – Appellant
Versus
Balina Chenchu Ramaiah, – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.1019 of 2021 ORDER:-

The 1st respondent herein filed O.S.No.631 of 2020 before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 03.12.1994 against the petitioners herein and the 2nd respondent herein.

2. The contention of the 1st respondent herein, in the plaint, is that the grandfather of the 2nd petitioner herein along with the 1st petitioner had executed an agreement of sale in favour of the 1st respondent, for sale of the suit property on 03.12.1994. As the 1st petitioner had acquired title and possession, by way of a Registered Document No.5039/82 and the grandfather of the 2nd petitioner had acquired right and title by virtue of a preliminary decree in O.S.No.2 of 1974 against which A.S.No.1322 of 1984 was filed, it was agreed that the parties to the agreement would wait till the disposal of A.S.No.1322 of 1984 and thereupon, the 1st respondent would be granted three months time from the date of disposal of A.S.No.1322 of 1984, to pay the remaining sale consideration and obtain a deed a sale from the vendors under the agreement. A.S.No.1322 of 1984 was disposed of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top