SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
M NARAYANA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
M SUDHARSHAN REDDY – Respondent


ORDER:

This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the orders, dated 12.10.2018, allowing the appeal in C.M.A.No.6 of 2017 on the file of the Court of IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, which was filed challenging the order, dated 31.08.2017, allowing the petition in I.A.No.1464 of 2016 in O.S.No.461 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC to grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents, their men, subordinates, servants and agents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the plaint schedule property.

2. Heard Sri B.S Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/plaintiff and Sri Virupaksha Dattatryeya Goud, learned counsel for the respondent/defendant. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant for convenience and clarity.

3. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the plaint schedule agricultural land of Ac.2.19 cents in Sy.No.199/4, Ac.0.11 cents in Sy.No.199/3, Ac.0.84 cents in Sy.No.199/1 total

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top