SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
C.Vasudeva Rao – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Pradesh State – Respondent


Advocates:
['TATA SINGAIAH GOUD', 'GP', 'B A RAO', 'SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI']

ORDER:

The petitioner has invoked the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd respondent Election Officer in rejecting the nomination of the petitioner on the ground that his name is not tallying with the serial number in the voters list, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Rule 22(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Conduct of Election Rules, 1964, and consequently, sought direction to the 3rd respondent to stay further proceedings pursuant to the issuance of election notification, dated 29.03.2022.

FACTUAL MATRIX:-

2) The petitioner is an employee working as Section Officer in Revenue Department of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat. The 2nd respondent is an Association in the name and style “The Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Section Officers’ Association” represented by its President. The petitioner claims to be the member of the said Association and also a voter on the rolls of the electoral roll of the said Association. There is an Executive Committee for the said Association consisting of certain office bearers. As the term of the office bearers of the said Executive Committee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top