JUDGMENT

Dt. 07.04.2022 (Per M.Satyanarayana Murthy, J)

1) Aggrieved by the order dated 05.11.2018 passed in W.P.No.2168 of

2017 by the learned single Judge, the State preferred this appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, raising several contentions.

2) The parties to the appeal will hereinafter be referred as arrayed before the learned single Judge for the sake of convenience and to avoid confusion.

3) The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition declaring the impugned order dated 15.12.2016 issued by respondent No.2 in respect of the petitioners lands in R.S.No.17 and corresponding to old Sy.No.23/1, 2, 3 an extent of Ac.04.50 cents, Sy.No.17 and 18 part corresponding to old Sy.No.23/1, 2, 3 and 24 part an extent of Ac.02.50 cents in Rs.No.17 and 18 part corresponding to old Sy.No.23/1, 2, 3, 24 part Ac.2.42 cents and R.S.No.17 and 18 part corresponding to old Sy.No.23/1, 2, 3, 24 part Ac.2.42 cents admeasuring total extent of Ac.11.84 cents in Edumetla Marripalem village, Parawada Mandal of Visakhapatnam District as illegal, against law and violation of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of Constitution of India and set aside the same.

4) The chequered history of proceedings before the