SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.Nagamalleshwaramma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri M. Srikanth, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Services-IV representing the respondents 1 to 3.

2. The petitioners 2 and 3 are the substituted petitioners, of the original petitioner T. Nagamaleswaramma, widow of late T. Ramakrishna Rao (deceased employee).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that late T. Ramakrishna Rao, (father of the petitioners 2 and 3) was working as Extension Officer in the Panchayat Raj Department. He retired from service on 13.06.1994. After his retirement a charge memo No.11514/CPR-F1/94 dated 28.10.1995 was served to him containing four charges as per the Article of Charges. He submitted reply denying all the charges. Two criminal cases i.e C.C.No.19 of 2007 and 11 of 2007, were also instituted against the deceased employee, on the file of VI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur. In view of the above cases, only provisional pension was released, but gratuity and other retiremental benefits were not paid to him T. Ramakrishna Rao died on 28.01.2007; consequently, CC No.19 of 2007 and CC No.11 of 2007 in which he was accused No.4 (A-4) and accused No.36 (A-36) respectively were dismissed a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top