SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO
VANGAPALLA VENKATARAMANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


COMMON ORDER :

As the issue involved in these writ petitions is one and the same, these matters are taken up together for disposal by this Common Order.

2. The facts in these writ petitions are similar and identical, therefore W.P.(AT) No.174 of 2021 is taken as lead case, and the facts therein are referred to for convenience.

3. The grievance of the petitioners in all these cases is that the Government formulated a scheme providing a provision of Employment to the displaced persons or their dependants vide G.O.Ms.No.98 I & CAD, dated 15.04.1986 and framed certain guidelines directing the concerned appointment authorities to fill up 50% vacancies of the categories of equivalent to Junior Assistant/Typists and the cadre below arising in Major & Medium Irrigation and Power Projects by the displaced families/or their dependants i.e., displaced persons or his/her son, daughter or spouse in the family, of the respective project duly following the rule of reservation for various categories viz., SC/ST/BC/Ex. Serviceman/Physically Handicapped & meritorious Sportsman etc. In view of the above, the applications for appointment from the eligible candidates shall be made to the District Collect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top