SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
NAGAM SIVARAMI REDDY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DIST & 37 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
PRL SECY, I & CAD DEPT, HYDERABAD & 4 OTHERS – Respondent


ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“To issue Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities 1 to 5 in not paying compensation to the petitioners DKT pata lands submerged in back waters of Somasila project, in Sy.No.255/4, 0.86cents Ac.2-43cents in Sy.No.365/1,an extent of Ac.2-58cetns in Sy.No.343, an extent of Ac.1-43 cents in Sy.No.355/2, an extent of 0.92cents in Sy.No.402/5, an extent of 0.34cents in Sy.No.235, an extent of 0.40cents in Sy.No.249/2, an extent of 0.78cents in Sy.No.347/1, an extent of Ac.3-98cents in Sy.No.348,an extent of Ac.2-39cents in Sy.No.274/2, an extent of 0.82cents 0-44cents in Sy.No.311 & 311/2, an extent of 0-25cents in Sy.No.345/3, an extent of 0.92cents in Sy.No.259, an extent of 0- 64 & Ac.1-64 cents in Sy.No.270/1 & 273, an extent of Ac.1- 20cents in Sy.No.300/1, an extent of 0-62cents in Sy.No.247 & 248, an extent of 0.36cents in Sy.No.402/2, an extent of Ac.4-85cents in Sy.No.255/3, an extent of Ac.5-00 cents in Sy.No.255/1, an extent of 0-93cents in Sy.No.362/2, an extent of Ac.2-75cents in Sy.No.53, an extent of Ac.3-30cents in Sy.No.22, an extent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top