SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2485

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J
P.GOUTHAM REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to quash theproceedings in M.C. No.4/2019 on the file of 2 nd respondent- Additional District Magistrate and Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Metropolitan Area, Vijayawada, dated 08.03.2019, under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), whereby, 2 nd respondent directed the petitioners and unofficial respondents herein to show cause as to why they should not be ordered to execute bonds with sureties for the like sum of Rs.20,000/- each, in order to keep peace for a period of one year.

2. Heard Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing 1 st respondent-State. Though notice was served on unofficial respondents, they did not choose to make appearance.

3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that the impugned proceedings in

M.C.No.4/2019 initiated by 2 nd respondent-Additional District Magistrate, by passing order dated 08.03.2019, is totally on non-application of mind, and there is no material brought before 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top