SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
B.E.Veerkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Collector, – Respondent


ORDER

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:-

“….to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent Joint Collector, Kurnool in No.D5/2907/2011 dated 31.3.2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the same…”

The case of the petitioner in nutshell is that he purchased an extent of Ac.0.91 cents in Survey No.160A/3 from the husband of 6th respondent by name Govindaiah Shetty during his life time vide registered sale deed No.1995 of 2009 dated 06.04.2009 for valuable consideration of Rs.69,000/- and since then the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the subject land. Evidencing the same, the revenue authorities also issued Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed in favour of the petitioner.

While the matter stood thus, on the request made by unofficial respondents 2 to 5 seeking cancellation of pattadhar passbook and Title Deed in his favour, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, vide his proceedings No.D.Dis/(E)1667/2010 dated 18.06.2011, cancelled the pattadhar passbook and title deed of petitioner without considering the relev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top