SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
Muktevi Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Alapati V.R.Satya Prasad – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

As parties to these two Revision Petitions are common and the issue pertains to the conditional Order passed by the Learned Trial Court and the consequential Order thereto, the same are disposed off by this Common Order.

2. Heard Mr.Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the Revision Petitions and Sri P.Anand Seshu, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.1152 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. The respondent/plaintiff along with his father filed the said suit for eviction of petitioner/defendant from the suit schedule premises and vacant possession of the same to them and also for future damages at Rs.40,000/- per month from 01.07.2019 till delivery of possession of the premises for use and occupation after terminating the lease and for costs of the suit. In the said suit, the respondent/plaintiff filed an application under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 8CPC9) for depositing arrears of rent. As the petitioner/tenant failed to deposit the rent as per the Orders of the learned Trial Court, the defence of the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top