Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
M.J.RATNA KANTH BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the seniority rules for royalty inspectors. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. process of appointments and recognition of direct recruits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments on the seniority determination between direct recruits and promotees. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. importance of adherence to established rules for recruitment. (Para 24 , 30 , 34) |
| 5. court's directive to finalize seniority based on lawful process. (Para 96 , 97 , 98) |
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri M. R. Tagore, learned counsel for respondents Nos.3 to 11, Sri V. Naga Praveen, learned counsel for respondents Nos.12 and 13, and learned AGP for Services – II, for respondents Nos.1 and 2.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
―...to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus;
(a) Set aside the final seniority list vide Memo No.1376/E3/2013, dated 21.01.2020 in the cadre of Royalty Inspectors as bad, illegal, without following principles of natural justice and unconstitutional;
(b) Declare the action of the respondents in not fixing and/or not maintaining the ratio between direct recruitees and prom
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
