SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
PODILI SIVA MURALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

The prestigious laudable flagship programme initiated by the State under the name and style of ―Navaratnalu - Pedalandariki Illu‖ is challenged initially by three petitioners by filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, later petitioner Nos.4 to 129 came on record vide orders of this Court dated 03.08.2021 passed in I.A.No.01 of 2021, to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.Ms.No.367 Revenue (Assignment-I) Department dated 19.08.2019 and G.O.Ms.No.488 Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 02.12.2019 are illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to assign/allot the plots under Constitutional transparent policy; consequently direct them not to proceed further in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.367 Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 19.08.2019 and G.O.Ms.No.488 Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 02.12.2019.

The petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and other petitioners are residents of Tenali claiming that they are houseless poor, eking out their livelihood as daily labourer, living below poverty line. Petitioners have no property to take shelter or any other source of livelihood. Peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top