SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
S A AZIZ – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER(SETTLEMENT) – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

These civil revision petitions arise out of the orders passed by the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam in different applications in different appeals. However, since the respondents in all these cases and the issues raised are one and the same, all these revision petitions are being disposed of by way of this common order.

2. The petitioners in all these revision petitions were in possession of small extents of land belonging to the railways. The petitioners were initially paying an annual licence fee of Rs.2,741/- to the 1st respondent and had been carrying on their business by setting up structures etc., in the land in their possession. The respondents, thereafter, initiated proceedings under Section 9 of the Public Premises Act, 2019 (for short 8the Act9) to evict the petitioners from these lands. The petitioners, having lost the proceedings under the Act, had filed appeals, against the said orders of eviction, before the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam. During the pendency of the said appeals, the 1st respondent is said to have furnished a statement of dues from the petitioners up to 31.02.2018. The 1st respondent, in the said statements, showed that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top