SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

ORDER:

The petitioner is the owner of a contract carriage bus bearing No.AP39TK9044. On account of Covid-19 pandemic he has decided not to ply the vehicle and did not pay the motor vehicle tax for the quarter ending 30.03.2021. The petitioner had now decided to ply the vehicle from 01.09.2021 and had approached the authorities for payment of the proportionate amount of motor vehicle tax for the month of September, 2021. The said request of the petitioner was rejected by the respondents on the ground that the petitioner had not paid the tax for the period

01.01.2021 to 31.08.2021.

Section 3 of the A.P. Motor Vehicle Tax Act, 1988 stipulates that every vehicle, in the nature of the vehicles owned by the petitioner, would attract motor vehicle tax, wherever such vehicles are used or kept in use in the State of Andhra Pradesh. This would mean that the owners of such vehicles would either pay the motor vehicle tax payable periodically or demonstrate to the authorities that the vehicle were not being used or kept for use in the State of Andhra Pradesh, and claim exemption from payment of such motor vehicle tax.

Rule 2 of the A.P. Motor Vehicle Taxation Rules, 1963 was introduced to provide a method of performing such an act. This Rule requires the owners of the vehicles who seek exemption from payment of motor vehicle tax, to intimate to the authorities before the tax period commenced, that the said person who owns the vehicle, is not going to use or keep the vehicle for use in the State of Andhra Pradesh for a certain period of time for which he would not be claim motor vehicle tax.

This Court by order dated 01.09.2021 in W.P.No.13780 of 2020 and batch, had held that the method set out in Rule-12A of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1963 is only to demonstrate that the owner of the vehicle has not used or kept his vehicle for use in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the period for which exemption is sought. This Court had also held that it was open to the owner of the said vehicle to demonstrate this fact by any other method that the owner of the vehicle chooses.

In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file a representation before the 2nd respondent authority, within a period of 10 days from today, setting out the facts and material to demonstrate that his vehicle has not been used or kept for use in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the period 01.01.2021 to 31.08.2021. The 2nd respondent, upon receipt of such representation, within a period of three weeks of receipt of the said representation, shall take a decision as to whether the vehicle of the petitioner has been used or kept for use in the State of Andhra Pradesh, for the aforesaid period. Depending upon the decision taken by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner shall be liable to pay the motor vehicle tax along with other penalties and charges as may be determined by the 2nd respondent. Needless to say, it would always be open to the petitioner to exercise his remedies against the order passed by the 2nd respondent.

Pending disposal of the representation of the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall permit the petitioner to ply his vehicle on payment of motor vehicle tax for the period 01.09.2021 to 30.09.2021.

However, if no representation is filed by the petitioner within the ten days granted, for this purpose, the respondents can take steps for recovery of the dues.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

9th September, 2021 Issue C.C. in 2 days.

(B/o) Js HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

9th September, 2021 Js

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top