SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Yannamreddy Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

The revision is filed by the petitioner/complainant aggrieved by the orders dated 12.3.2021 in C.F.R.No.102/2021 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa in dismissing the petition with regard to taking cognizance of the offence punishable under section 411 of IPC against A4 and A5.

2. The petitioner filed private complaint under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. seeking to forward the same to the Sub Inspector of police, Chinnachowk U/G police station, Kadapa city for registration of the crime and for conducting investigation. On perusal of the record, the Court below has deleted the complaint against A4 and A5 with the following observation:

<…where as the contention of the complainant that A4 and at are in possession of the property knowing the same to be stolen, the said allegation is not believable, as they would have received the same as A1 to a3 had pledged them on the belief that they belong to them. The complainant could not able to prove that A4 and a5 has knowledge that the properties are stolen properties when A1 to A3 were pledging them with them and it is his evidence only that he himself informed through legal notice that the said property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top