SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VEGESNA VENKATA VIJAYA JHANSI LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the impugned notice vide Roc.No.172/2021/DT, dated 14.06.2021 to the petitioner is wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.”

The claim of the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner has inherited the properties under a Registered Will dated 23.10.1982 executed by his maternal grand father by name D. Kamaraju S/o Venkat Ramaraju. After the demise of the executant of the Will on 07.07.1986, the husband of the petitioner came into possession and enjoyment and his name was also mutated in the revenue records. After demise of her husband in the year 2019, she succeeded the same and continuously in possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 2.59 cents situated in Sy.No. 388/1 and an extent of Ac.1.00 cents situated in Sy.no. 384/4A of Kalla Mandal, Narsapur Division, West Godavari District. While matter stood thus, the impugned notice dated 14.06.2021 vide reference in Roc.no.17

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top