S. Koteswara Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER:
The petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring the order dated 09.11.2020 passed by the 1st respondent vide Memo No.6857/M.1(2)/2018-2 to the extent of directing the petitioner to pay all mineral revenue arrears and determining the lease passed by 2nd respondent vide D.Dis.proc.No.1758/R1-1/2018 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 & 19 of Constitution of India r/w the A.P. Minor Mineral Concessions Rules, 1966 (for short, ‘the APMMC Rules, 1966’) and consequentially set aside the same.
2. Petitioner’s case pithily is thus:
Petitioner holds quarry lease for colour granite in an extent of 7 Hectares in Sy.No.73 of Melisathiwada Village, Tekkali Mandal, Srikakulam District for a period of 20 years. The Director of Mines and Geology/2nd respondent vide D.Dis.proc.No.1758/R1-1/2018, dated 08.06.2018, determined the quarry lease of the petitioner on the ground that the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Srikakulam/3rd respondent submitted proposal for determination after inspection of the quarry lease and after noting certain lapses on the part of the lessee as follows:
(a) The lessee was not operating the quarry lease and there were no traces of quarrying
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.