SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

N SUDHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
['D V SASIDHAR', 'GP', 'K MADHAVA REDDY', 'V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR']

ORDER:

The 4 respondent is the absolute owner and possessor of a Kalyana Mandapam situated at Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District, known as Sri Sitarama Kalyana Mandapam. This Kalyana Mandapam was earlier under the possession of one Sri G.V. Purushottam Sarma, who claimed ownership over the Kalyana Mandapam. In order to recover possession of the said property, the temple had filed O.A.No.130 of 2009 before the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments, Kakinada and the same was allowed on 16.02.2010. This resulted in a long litigation before this Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which ended with the dismissal of SLP No. 17253 of 2015 and SLP No. 20755 of 2015, giving liberty to Sri G.V. Purushottama Sarma to approach the civil Court for declaration of title. The petitioner submits that he was the Chairman of the temple when the matters were pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and he had taken a lot of interest in recovering this property for the temple.

2. The petitioner submits that in a parallel set of proceedings, th Sri D. Chandrasekhar claiming to be the Dharmadhikari of the 5 respondent had raised claims on the Kalyana mandapam, which were th against the 4 Responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top