SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Gotham Prasada Rao – Appellant
Versus
Chairman and Managing Director – Respondent


ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to appoint him, as per the marks i.e., 57.6 marks published by the respondents, for the post of Energy Assistant (JLM Gr.III).

The claim of the petitioner before this Court is that he has applied for the post of Energy Assistant (JLM Gr.III) as per the Notification dated 02.08.2019. He was shortlisted and called for the physical test. At the time of verification, the certificates were verified. As the petitioner met the eligibility criteria he was allowed to participate in the physical test. He had completed the physical tests and ultimately he was awarded total marks of 57.6. The select list was published on 30.09.2019, and the petitioner realised that several other persons, who got similar marks, were selected and he was overlooked. At that stage he realised that at the time of uploading of the certificates the marks obtained by the petitioner in the 10th Class were typed as 36 marks instead of 38 marks and therefore, the petitioner’s case was overlooked. The petitioner’s case is he has actually secured 38 marks and not 36 marks. Therefore, he made a representation on 07.10.2019 t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top