SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Arigela Sriramulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed, questioning the action of respondents in proposing to demolish the thatched house of petitioner bearing D.No.2-82 in an extent of Ac.0.09 cents in Vakatippa village, Kapileswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, without recourse to law, declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to procedure, consequently direct respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in an extent of Ac.0.09 cents along with house therein bearing D.No.2-82.

2. The petitioner is claiming that he is in possession and enjoyment of the property since long time, having purchased the same under registered document bearing No.1767 of 1959, the petitioner is economically poor person, he raised construction and assigned D.No.2-82, the encroachment if any is not objectionable, but respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law.

3. Respondents filed counter contending that the land where the house bearing No.2-82 is in existence is “Gramakantam”, the petitioner is an encroacher. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to claim any reli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top